To Buy Or To Pirate? Get A Clue RIAA!

Is the RIAA’s strategy to stop music piracy working? According to a recent study, interesting data has been collected from college students that holds both good and bad news for the RIAA. Where does this leave the future of downloading?


To Buy Or To Pirate204 undergraduates from a large Midwestern University were promised anonymity and were recently sampled in a piracy study since students download more often than non-students. Researchers believed college students were the best representatives of digital music consumers and studied an equal number of males and females in regards to software piracy, movie piracy, and music piracy. The Elsevier findings blew away previous research and statistics about digital pirates.

Researchers set out to test these business students for the decision factors of obtaining online music, such as how important the ethical, legal and social consequences are in of music piracy. Motivations and theoretical research found that among 24 kinds of questionable Internet behaviors, downloading copyright-protected music and movies is considered the least wrong. An acquisition-mode framework for musical piracy was developed and was based upon previous research.

Although the RIAA suggests outrageous losses due to digital pirates, other research has pointed out that piracy has an insignificant effect on CD sales. From the musicians perspective, it takes the sale of about 500,000 CD’s for most artists to break even. By making their music available for free, some musicians believe it is beneficial. Once a listener has heard and appreciated the artist’s music, he may be more willing to buy future work. However, consumers who consider music piracy to negatively affect musicians and music companies in terms of profit will be less likely to engage in music piracy.

Many of the 204 college students surveyed admitted to downloading music as a way to sample what music they might later purchase. All the students downloaded music that they couldn’t find on the radio, while 2/3 of those listeners ended up making a music purchase. 40% of them downloaded music to sample what they would never consider purchasing; they didn’t like it after hearing it. Consumers who consider the Internet as an important medium to discover new music are more likely to engage in piracy.

Researchers combined results of other studies with new perspectives for studying pirates and what influences their decisions. They set out to discover the ethical, legal and economic decision-making reasons behind digital piracy. Then they broke down the study into eight factors: Networking effects, legal/ethical , comparisons to other pirates, type of music pirated, economics, overcharging, no risk, and situational pirating.

While the RIAA research reported a ridiculous music industry loss of about $45 billion and that digital pirates are an angry group of people who feel “ripped off” and are “out to get” the music industry, this study showed piracy intentions boil down to what type of music, network effects, and no risk to the pirate. In many cases, what has previously been “proven” as the motives behind piracy has declined. Younger males with low income seem to be the most prone to pirating. Once a person has pirated, they are more likely to continue doing so.

Given below is a table, which shows the results of the principal components factors analysis. Note that items in the red cells indicate a negative loading factor as compared to the positive loading factors in the green cells.

Factor Loadings Item description
1. Network effects .64 Record companies are benefited by piracy because more people will be exposed to new music and will want to purchase new music
.57 Record stores are benefited by piracy because more people will be exposed to new music and will want to purchase new music
.75 A good reason to pirate music is so you can listen to it and then decide if you want to purchase it
.78 If I pirated a certain CD and I liked it, I would recommend it to my friends
.79 If I pirated a certain song and I liked it, I would recommend it to my friends
.76 Downloading pirated music helps consumers discover new musicians and bands
.72 Musicians are benefited by piracy because more people will be exposed to new music and will want to purchase new music
.76 Pirating music is a good way to discover new artists
2. Legal/ethical .65 Pirating just a couple of songs is not so bad
− .64 It is fair to prosecute music pirates
− .69 I consider piracy of music to be unethical
− .78 I consider music piracy to be the same as stealing
− .75 People who pirate music should feel guilty
− .71 People who pirate music should be punished
− .73 I consider music piracy to be a crime
3. Comparisons to other piracies .83 Pirating music is not as bad as pirating books
.87 Pirating music is not as bad as pirating movies
.86 Pirating music is not as bad as pirating software
.87 Pirating music is not as bad as pirating photographs
4. Depends on type of music piracy .71 It is okay to pirate music as long as you don’t share it with anyone else
.55 Keeping pirated music on a computer’s hard drive is not as bad as burning pirated music onto a CD
.61 It is okay to pirate music from well-known artists, but less appropriate to pirate music from unknown artists
5. Economics .71 Music piracy contributes to an increase in prices of recorded music
.62 Music companies incur a loss due to piracy
6. Overcharging .80 Music is too expensive to purchase
.74 Record companies could charge lower prices and still be profitable
7. No risk .72 It is easy to pirate music without getting caught
8. Situational .58 If you don’t have enough money for music and you really like it, it is okay to pirate it
.55 It is okay to purchase music legally and then make copies for friends
9. Consider penalties .55 If people get caught pirating, it will not affect their future very much
.68 I think the legal penalties for music piracy are minor

Pirates’ music purchases may be declining, but legally downloading music is an important part of the music industry’s future. The RIAA needs to wake up! If the pirate likes the artist, he is more prone to digitally purchase one or two really great songs off a CD. When the RIAA rants about losses, it may only anger the consumers who will then pirate more music. In regards to software, most software pirates do not consider it especially harmful to the manufacturers due to the inflated fixed costs of software. Network effects strongly figure into piracy, while some other network motivations, such as gift-giving and receiving, uploaders and downloaders, has not been fully researched.

Sadly, this same research group believes there should be a study to determine the percent of piracy based upon rebelliousness, a state in which one feels compelled to behave contradictory to standards or established rule, and upon if the pirate enjoys defiant rock music. Anyone who pirates can tell you that those are not the driving factors in deciding to buy or to pirate. Perhaps when a person was really young, the feeling of rebellion played a part, perhaps way back when sharing music via P2P was new, then something such as Metallica raising a stink over downloading their music might have caused a desire to go and specifically pirate their tunes. Perhaps back in the beginning of peer-to-peer sharing, that might have been how some pirates discovered groups such as Metallica. In fact, that might have been their first song ever pirated. But pirates are developing and ever-changing, growing older and wiser. Digital pirates are a fact of life and no study, RIAA, MPAA can shut them down.

Journal Reference: doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.002

Image Credit: Flickr

Bookmark and Share

Related Posts

  • To RIAA, From the Gulf, Legal Options Perform Worst Here
    What would work best against digital piracy, in a country which is cultural...
    Read More
  • Bad News RIAA, Research Shows That It Ain’t Working
    RIAA and anti-p2p companies have constantly engaged in various methods to t...
    Read More
  • Ryan
    A whole lot of unsubstantiated opinion here. Where is the proof that pirating music has increased sales in comparison to previous purchasing habits.

    Pirating occurs because people don't see it as stealing, (according to the data above), it is easy to get, and they do not think they will get caught, the web making them somewhat anonymous. It gets justified by dehumanizing the profiteers as large wealthy corporations, not individuals that would be hurt by these actions.

    By not paying, you willfully choose not to pay the artist, the recording studio, the song writer, the supporting artists, etc. Let's face it...music is too expensive, but stealing is still stealing and you know it.
  • Johnny Masonite
    LOL, why buy when you can get it for free!

    RT
    www.online-privacy.es.tc
  • djdjdjjdjdjd
    today is the only time in history of mankind in which some lobbys are trying to criminalize sharing stuff.

    it is not stealing, because the copy does not disappear. it is sharing.
  • Tony
    is doing all these studies really nessasary.......The reason people pirate songs is because they can.....

    why pay for something you can get for free.

    Almost every single teenager that knows how to use a computer downloads music.

    As long as the internet exists....people will pirate music, photos, programs.....you name it.

    The industry is simply going to have to change.....artists are not going to be able to rely on music sales as their primary source of income....maybe concerts, posters, so on so forth

    Now days music artists and sports stars are payed way more then what they are worth.....and music artists are just going to have to wake up to the reality that they will no longer be able to make an extremely rediculious amount of money from music sales.
  • ken
    excuse me? does anybody remember how the recording industry got its panties in a wad over the cassette tape? or the video tape? didn't the industry survive them? hello?
  • jess
    So, where can you find a larger version of that thumbnail picture? She looks great.
  • bob johnson
    Music is free on the radio

    Movies are free on tv

    If you subscribe to netflix or hbo they will get there eventually. Why wait.

    All media .. movies, music, books, software ... are WAY overpriced to begin with ... Like 2000%!
  • I saw Hillary Rosen (former head of RIAA) on the news the other day, supporting the extreme right. I think she said she eats babies.
  • Given the RIAA/MPAA's attitude on to sue grandma's IP address and anyone that breathes, I simply refuse to buy cd's. I go to my local library. I do buy movies at Wal-Mart's $5 - $10 bin. I also use Hulu. Never used a torrent, but I loved reading Pirate Bay rants and reply's to the idiot's at RIAA.
  • Ryan
    My God, how clueless are you all?

    @bob johnson
    Media is priced where it is because there are people willing to pay that much for it. Simple economics, regardless of what you or I believe is the "right price." Music and movies are not "free" over radio/TV, that medium only exists as free to listen/view because of commercials: advertisers who spend money on ads that try to get you to spend spend spend. Nothing, repeat nothing is free (especially if a profit might be made).

    @Tony and @Johnny Masonite
    Sure, you can get content for free over the internet through any number of torrents or direct downloads or other P2P technology. But there is a hell of a lot of work that goes into each and every song or movie that you download. Have you ever watched the credits after a feature-length movie? Those credits last longer than any youtube clip I've ever seen. Movie stars and music artists might be over paid, but there a lot of people who work on those projects who aren't.

    Oh, and most movies and albums loose money. If I remember right, only 1/10 are profitable. The production houses use money from successful movies/albums to make up for the unsuccessful ones and to finance the next round. Personally, I don't believe they can be making much money if production budgets are always rising and it's financed by the last big hit...

    @jess
    Wow. You went to "A website dedicated to innovations & research in the fields of science & technology" to oogle a thumbnail...

    @Richard Cranium
    Thank you! Wish more people were as concerned as you are about social responsibility.
  • Joe McDonald
    I pirate because the MPAA/RIAA exist. They treat people the way the mafia did. The idea of DRM and the restrictions on the devices I want to listen to the music on us upsetting. But when they sue people and they claim ~$150,000 is needed to make up for the loss is just rediculous.
  • Jayho
    The reality of the music industry these days is that 99% of real artists (those not making money from pepsi commercials) make barely any money off of record sales. From that $23.99 that you spent on the latest CD the artist may get a few pennies. Artists make money through concert tickets, t-shirts, etc. I am a musician myself, and I expect that people will find my music through the internet. I hope that they will download my stuff, like it, and then decide to come and see a show because that is where you make the real money. Album sales just pad the bank accounts of labels, and it's the labels that are causing a stink about "piracy". record labels may not survive the advent of file sharing, but artists will probably do better than ever now that the distribution (the hardest part!) is now free and easy.
  • Nikita Hengbok
    Hey! Someone used my pic! That's my pic as a pirate girl from my Flickr album!

    Link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hengbok-nikita/900...

    Is this consider as piracy?!? LOL! xD
  • admin
    @Nikita, The article includes due credit to you as a link at the bottom of the article. This credit has existed ever since this article got published. Thanks!
  • Nikita Hengbok
    Hey admin, I'm not complaining. I'm just joking. See my BIG smile? =D

    Cheers!
  • D
    This is the age of information, the age of the internets, the age of the web and most definitely the age of sharing.

    Think about it, right now this very second millions of links/urls are being shared across the web, this very sec millions of thoughts and opinions are being shared on blogs, in youtube videos, and status updates the more connected we are as a society the more we are going to SHARE period that is the basic idea of communication to SHARE thoughts, feelings, and expressions that is what we do every sec of everyday we SHARE intellectual property between our family, friends, and co workers, which leads me to wonder why media such as T.V shows, music and movies should not be shared as well.....

    The answer is because it is illegal to share copyrighted IP simply because everyone is bound by LAW to pay for the right to experience this IP which means no one is supposed to share this or ANY copyrighted IP simply because that would mean someone gained copyrighted material without paying for it and due to the inherent design of the monetary system all services, products, jobs, careers, education, healthcare, ect could simply not exist in our economy unless it is making a profit which i turn means you have to pay for everything you need nothing can ever be free in such a system.

    you want to know why I share?

    I share because that is what we do, it is who we are it is basic human behavior its not my fault the powers that be cling to an outdated monetary system that was designed back in the early/late 1900s and that these companies/corporations/orginizations have the audacity to punish us for simply behaving like normal human beings....

    wheres the logic in that?
  • Robert
    @Ryan:
    "A whole lot of unsubstantiated opinion here. Where is the proof that pirating music has increased sales in comparison to previous purchasing habits."

    The proof is referenced in both the main article and in several studies. Those studies are produced by people who are far less biased than the trade groups, who's studies have been debunked so many times it is not funny.

    You sound like a shill. If these companies are losing so much money, over the last decade, why have their profits been steadily increasing and record high? Don't just take Cary Sherman's opinion as fact, he's been proven wrong countless times!

    The industry is run by accountants and lawyers, not music enthusiasts. Like Goldman Sacs or Fannie Mae, these guys would sell their souls, and the souls of their artists, if it could net them another dollar.

    Don't think so? Why are so many artists backing up all the "unsubstantiated" opinions here?

    Sorry man, you really sound like a trade group shill.
  • aN0n
    Looks like the RIAA trolls have noticed this article.
  • Brent
    Ryan Said "But there is a hell of a lot of work that goes into each and every song or movie that you download."
    Ummm - Bullshit? Ya Hollywood movies are expensive to make, but music? There are thousands of indie recordings done every day that cost almost nothing to produce. The days of the multi million dollar studio are done. Anyone with a computer, some decent mikes, and a little skill can make a CD. So your argument is pretty much crap. Sure you can spend thousands on a slick disney-esque recording but that's your descision - don't expect to cover your costs unless you sell a ton of them. That's the market, that's today's reality.
    It's funny how market based principals go out the window in this discussion. Its simple supply & demand. As supply increases, the price goes down. Well supply is infinite, so the price should be very close to free.
  • Tony Nicholas
    Q: How does someone copying or sharing a music file, that is no longer available, and will not be made available, hurt the artists, and the RIAA profits?

    Q: How does someone sharing their copy of a book, movie, or music, hurt profits or the artist, if it is not longer available?
blog comments powered by Disqus